Re: RFC: Fixing the "nobody" user?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 07:39 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Like I said, I'm thinking of "rsync", "tar", and "star". Also,
> people.... do some interesting scripting to detect things like failed
> NFS configurations. I'm not saying that's a blocker, but shifting it
> to overlap with the current "nfsnobody" is likely to break some
> people's tools in the field, especially if they run the latest Fedora
> alongside RHEL, CentOS,  or previous Fedora releases.

The breakage for some will be un-breakage for someone else, and being
consistent with the kernel point of view and other distributions, in
this case, is more important IMO.

Simo.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux