Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-15)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/16/2016 05:33 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>> On 07/15/2016 05:19 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>>    * AGREED: FESCo approves KillUserProcess=yes by default with the
>>> steps sgallagh has proposed in the ticket (+7, 0, 0)  (jwb,
>>> 17:04:58)  
>>
>> "Tier 1 packages must be ported to support operation under 
>> KillUserProcesses=yes"
>>
>> Is it safe to assume that FESCo members will do all the porting since 
>> they where the ones that proposed, decided and agreed upon that
>> condition?
> 
> Don't be silly. Naturally those who want to see KillUserProcesses happen
> will have to do the work to make it happen (or pay someone to do the
> work). That's how it always works in Fedora. Fesco merely decided that
> at least some programs are important enough that SystemD isn't allowed
> to nonchalantly pull the rug out from under them. If some people want to
> change the contract between user programs and the operating system,
> then the work it takes to adapt the user programs is part of the work
> it takes to make that change. That much really should have been obvious
> from the beginning.
> 

This is a piece of it, yes. There are certainly some very common work patterns
that would be disrupted here. This change is highly polarizing and while it does
have some clear benefits, if it were turned on right now, FESCo believes that
the consequences would outweigh them.

Rather than forbidding the Change outright, we settled on putting together a set
of conditions that would have to be satisfied in order to end up with a solution
for which the benefits would outweigh the costs. In this case, we decided that
FESCo would rule on a certain set of important packages for which not having a
transparent solution for our users would be treated as a blocker to this effort
(Tier 1). We will also maintain a second set of packages (Tier 2) that we
recognize may be affected but are not critical and can be fixed (or not) at a
later time.

In the end, we hope this will lead to a minimum impact on our users while
gaining the maximum benefit from KillUserProcesses.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux