> On 07/11/2016 10:49 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > >> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should > >> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates > >> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback > >> after that can be either reported in bugzilla or to the package > >> maintainers directly. Its not like providing positive or negative > >> karma will make any changes to already pushed package to updates > >> repository. > > > > I do have valid use cases. We've had examples of important packages having > > been pushed stable too quickly and breaking some computers (think kernel, > > mesa). The bodhi comments can then be used to provide a description of the > > problem, suggest any workarounds or fixes, and also link to more > > information e.g. in the bugzilla or common bugs wiki, etc. The Bodhi pages > > are easy to find (if I perform a system update and the computer breaks, I > > look at what was included in the last update, and look at any bodhi > > feedback for those packages), so it makes perfect sense to inform people > > there. It's much harder to search bugzilla to find issues with a > > particular package. > > > > Well, IMHO for description of the problem and fixes Bugzilla is the > right place. It's a bug in a stable package then, no testing feedback > anymore. Yes, of course, Bugzilla is the right place to deal with the bug. However, Bodhi is a much better place to inform affected people about it (e.g. link the bug). That's what I was trying to convey. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
