On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/05/2016 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my >> experience is that it's more likely than not that it won't boot, and >> no one cares. > > > Well, that's independent for the state as primary vs secondary architecture. > > If we remove i686 as a primary architecture, we will not have i686 packages > in the x86_64 repository. Is this what we want? We're in the process of redefining what constitutes a secondary arch and this is part of that consideration. There's a bunch of proprietary common third party tools/apps that people rely on that still need i686 around. > (For me, armhfp is more more of a pain point due to slow build times.) That will be changing soon, we have the replacement hardware and now F-24 is out it's one of my primary focuses to get it into production. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
