On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Timely article in the Register today: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/ > > I've been thinking about this as i686 is so often broken that I've now > stopped bothering to test it in the libguestfs tests that I do on > Rawhide: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libguestfs.git/commit/?id=aa63cef2d7679e1906551ef4e46c2e9a8861b56c > > If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my > experience is that it's more likely than not that it won't boot, and > no one cares. > > Do we have stats for the relative proportion of i686 vs x86-64 downloads? No really because of mirrors etc, but mirror manager stats from Feb (FPL DevConf talk) list i686 as around 20% unique IP hits, that doesn't take into account proxies/NAT using same IP etc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
