Re: Fixing /.autorelabel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:25:36 -0700,
 Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Do we actually *need* the second patch if we have the first? I mean, my
suggestion was just to do the first patch; if we do that, do we
actually need to worry about making the relabel happen any earlier than
it currently does?

Can't processes that start before the relabel is complete, get incorrectly labelled? If so, that can cause a potentially cause a problem with the labelling of files created by those processes and access from those processes if the system shifts to enforcing mode later.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux