On Monday, July 4, 2016 6:02:52 PM CDT Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > Upstream has moved licensecheck to a new stand-alone package and removed > it from devscripts-2.16.6 onwards. > > I've packaged licensecheck, along with a dependency, review requests are > here: > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666 : > perl-Pod-Constants - Include constants from POD > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352667 : licensecheck - > Simple license checker for source files > > I have a question about the upgrade path though: > The current situation is: > > devscripts-minimal: > - licensecheck > - checkbashism > > The new situation would be: > > devscripts-minimal: > - checkbashisms > > licensecheck: > - licensecheck > > Since devscripts-minimal will only contain checkbashisms, I'd plan to > introduce a devscripts-checkbashisms package with that script, and keep > devscripts-minimal (temporarily?) as a metapackage which requires > devscripts-checkbashisms and licensecheck. So: > > devscripts-minimal: > Requires: devscripts-checkbashisms > Requires: licensecheck > > Does this make sense? I suppose I still need Obsoletes: > devscripts-minimal < 2.16.6 in both licensecheck and > devscripts-checkbashisms? > > Thanks > > Sandro > Hey Sandro, What exactly does licensecheck do? and how is it different to the procject at https://sourceforge.net/projects/oslc/ I ask because I would like to have us implement something to check licensing when people upload tarballs to lookaside cache and report when licenses change. Dennis -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
