On 15 Jun 2016 17:47, "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > > That's precisely what they are doing on non-Ubuntu distributions,
> > > disabling confinement.
> > Thats is pretty crappy. That means things will keep accidentally being
> > packaged that depends on things not in the ubuntu core. It also means
> > that there is zero sandboxing.
>
> Can you elaborate on how this is different from Flatpak's
> currently-rather-open sandboxing (as seen elsewhere in this thread)?
>
> --
>
Perhaps because flatpak doesn't tell the user to disable selinux and is not being actively promoted as the new secure application deployment technology being embraced by multiple major distributions?
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
