On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:44:27PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > Considering how this actively negates the security of our distribution and > how this is being promoted in the media, with them pointing to the > snapcraft site and the instructions there with COPR looking like it's on > approved Fedora infrastructure (for those who don't understand anyone can > COPR and there is no review) I honestly wonder if this is a good case for > pulling a COPR repo... > Would FESCO have authority here or is that going to be inadvisable a road? There are plenty of things packaged in COPR which don't work with SELinux or are otherwise even more horrible. That's okay; it's one of the reasons we have COPR in the first place. Some things will "incubate" there and hopefully become less horrible (and maybe even migrate into the distro proper). Other things might stay terrible forever. In this particular case, though, given the note about SELinux support being planned, it looks like it's the better of the two situations, really. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
