RE: RFC: Optimizing for 386

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "'Nick Bargnesi'" <nbargnesi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From: "Joseph D. Wagner" <technojoecoolusa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:40:39 -0600
Cc: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3077b8a0050119082743fff58a@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcT+Q8OIjYBHUyykTIO9FRgqTnLSigAAWIwA

> Acckk!  All RPM's are optimized for i386?  But I'm running x86_64!

OK, let me make clarify what I said.

AMENDED: All IA32 RPM's are optimized for 386 architecture.

x86_64 uses a completely separate set of RPM's.

Joseph D. Wagner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
  - From: Chris Adams

References:
- Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
  - From: Nick Bargnesi

Prev by Date: RE: RFC: Optimizing for 386
Next by Date: RE: RFC: Optimizing for 386
Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
Next by thread: Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux