On 2/06/2016 08:37, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 22:30:14 +0000 > Christopher <ctubbsii@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Thanks. I opened: >> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5333 to address >> the issue more broadly (I figure this would be useful to others, and >> not just me). > > I don't think there's a more broad solution that will currently > work. ;) > > We have requested OpenID bugzilla logins, but that has not yet > happened. > > We assume maintainers/qa folks want to use their real address (the one > they list in fas) in bugzilla. I suppose we could try and fallback to a > @fedoraproject alias if the real one doesn't exist, but I am not sure > how hard that would be. > > Right now we have a list of exceptions to the above assumption (ie, > people who have told us they do want to use their alias instead of > their real email address). It happens infrequently enough that > maintaining those hasn't really been a problem. Hi, we expect to have SAML authentication working in Bugzilla 5, I'm implimenting it for Red Hat customer accounts ATM and also testing with FAS in the hopes we can get it "for free" :) Cheers, Jeff. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
