On Ter, 2016-05-31 at 20:07 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > On Ter, 2016-05-31 at 21:56 +0000, opensource@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > smb4k (maintained by: sergiomb, rdieter) > > > kde-plasma-smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires > > > plasma4(scriptengine-declarativeappletscript) = 0.1 > > > smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires kdebase-runtime = 16.04.1-1.fc25 > > > > > > sergiomb: strigi > > strigi still in rawhide [1] > Nothing in rawhide should depend on strigi anymore. And, yes, it's > still > there and not retired yet per the original notice in this thread: > "The > following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are > orphaned > for six weeks" > > > > > my buildrequires : > > BuildRequires: cmake >= 2.6.0 > > BuildRequires: kdelibs4-devel >= 4.4.0 > > BuildRequires: gettext > > BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils > > BuildRequires: libappstream-glib > > > > What I can do ? > > > > [1] > > koji wait-repo rawhide --build=strigi-0.7.8-12.fc24 > > Successfully waited 0:02 for strigi-0.7.8-12.fc24 to appear in the > > rawhide > > repo > Are you implying that something *does* depend on it and/or you have > a > package that fails to build in rawhide? No, I'm implying if we rebuild smb4k in rawhide package will still depend on strigi ... (by dep chain ?!? ) . So I think we should retire strigi, fix broken deps of (I guess [1] ) kdelibs4-devel and after that we can rebuild smb4k in rawhide and fix dependency on strigi . [1] As Till Maas wrote "Also kde-runtime and other packages have a build requirement on strigi" Thanks, > -- Rex > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject > .org -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
