Le lundi 17 janvier 2005 Ã 12:11 -0500, Alan Cox a Ãcrit : > On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 03:30:50PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > bytecode. I don't think there is anyone made the argument than gcj + > > native is faster than commercial jvm + bytecode. > > Do the benchmarks on a real world test set or for that matter just compare > the start up time of a proprietary commercial jv eclipse and a compiled one. > > The compiled stuff starts much faster and consumers astronomically less > memory and memory bandwidth when running. There are also some nice java > bindings for Gnome which are useful when you need to run the same core code > with a different UI on your phone and Linux box. > > I still want an implementation of lcdui for gcj so I can play java phone games > on my PC but I digress... I stand corrected;) I hope the gcj packages in FC4 will prove this to all. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
