I'll jump on the /etc/repos.d bandwagon. It follows a convention
commonly found in lots of other configuration directories and I feel
it's much more concise and clear than /etc/distro.repos.d.
I'm not sure I fully understand the rationale behind using
distros.repos.d as the directory name in the first place. Distros, in
the Linux context, suggest something fairly well defined; variants of
the Linux based operating systems. To stick with the the original
justification:
> [...] /etc/distro.repos.d path is a
package manager agnostic name [...]
I would think something called /etc/software.repos.d or
/etc/vendors.repos.d would make more sense if you really want to keep
the foo.bar.d convention.
-Ted
On 05/16/2016 04:59 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 12.5.2016 v 17:51 Mike Chambers napsal(a):
Hell, if really want to make it simple, why not just /etc/repos.d?
+1
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
