Excerpts from Tom Hughes's message of 2016-05-12 09:15 +01:00: > On 12/05/16 09:07, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > Shouldn't that be /usr/lib/distro.repos.d (for > > distribution-provided > > data) with usual rules for overriding/masking in /etc/distro.repos.d (for > > local administrator)? > > Well equally isn't the "distro." prefix all wrong if it includes things > other than distribution provided repositories... Agreed... if end users and third-party repos are expected to also put their configs into this directory, then having "distro" in the name doesn't really make sense. If the objection to yum.repos.d is that they are not just "yum repos" anymore, since clients other than yum can consume them -- then maybe we can think of them as "yum-formatted package repos" (that is, "repositories of RPM packages with metadata in the format originated by yum"). In that case, yum.repos.d still seems reasonable to me, but if you *really* want to avoid the word "yum" in there then maybe package-repos.d or package.repos.d or packagerepos.d? -- Dan Callaghan <dcallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
