Re: Policy change on emulators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/04/2016 05:20 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     Some emulators (applications which emulate another platform) are not
>     permitted for inclusion in Fedora. These rules will help you determine
>     whether an emulator is acceptable for Fedora.
> 
>     * Emulators which depend on firmware or ROM files to function may not be
>     included in Fedora, unless the copyright holder(s) for the firmware/ROM
>     files give clear permission for the firmware/ROM files to be distributed
>     (either under a Fedora permissible license or under the Fedora firmware
>     exception criteria). Note: This only covers the situation where an
>     emulator will not run at all without firmware/ROM files. For example,
>     emulators that compile and run, but ship with no game ROMs are not
>     covered by this rule.
> 
> 
> Does this mean that most console emulators (i.e. NES/SNES/MasterSystem/Genesis
> emulators) are now acceptable in Fedora?

Presumably it means that those emulators that are offered under an acceptable
license and do not require a firmware image (like most Playstation emulators)
would be acceptable, yes.

I'd guess this would also cover ScummVM (which has a number of open-source games
available for it as well).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux