Re: Policy change on emulators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On May 3, 2016 12:07 PM, "Tom Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Emulators which depend on firmware or ROM files to function may not be
> included in Fedora, unless the copyright holder(s) for the firmware/ROM
> files give clear permission for the firmware/ROM files to be distributed
> (either under a Fedora permissible license or under the Fedora firmware
> exception criteria). Note: This only covers the situation where an
> emulator will not run at all without firmware/ROM files. For example,
> emulators that compile and run, but ship with no game ROMs are not
> covered by this rule.
>
> * Emulators must not ship with any ROM files (e.g. games) unless those
> ROM files are available under a Fedora permissible license and have been
> built from source code in the Fedora buildsystem.
>
> * Emulators must not point to any third-party sites which provide
> firmware or ROM files that are distributed without the clear and
> explicit permission of their copyright holders.

Does this mean that, if we strip FreeDOS out of dosemu / dosemu2, we can ship it and even point to a website with FreeDOS binaries?

AIUI the only problem with FreeDOS is that no one knows how to compile it with a free software toolchain.  As far as I know, the binary is pretty clearly redistributable.  (Hmm.  Could FreeDOS ship as a firmware blob?  That seems dubious to me.)

--Andy

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux