On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016 11:22:30 -0500 > Adam Miller <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Collection of RPMs is fine, the goal is just not to ship non-rpm code >> or content yet outside of Docker-ized application control scripts >> where needed/applicable. > > ok. >> >> It shouldn't but it can in the future, I was more or less replicating >> this information in the beginning to hopefully leave some space for >> this to change in the future of the Fedora Modularization efforts >> because a module could potentially have it's own versioning scheme >> outside of the content inside of it. > > Has it been decided that modules are docker containers? No. AIUI, a docker container is one potential delivery artifact for a module. There are others, such as RPM repos. So it is not a strict "modules are containers" mapping. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
