On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 10:03:51AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Monday, 02 May 2016 at 15:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > [...] > >> All of the major stakeholders that usually trigger a mass rebuild (GCC, glibc, > >> etc.) have been notified directly and are on board with this. This announcement > >> was to ensure that no one was left surprised by this in case we missed telling > >> anyone directly. > > > > I'm not so sure about GCC. It's been updated to 6.1 in both F25 and F24 > > and it's causing bugs already. For example, anything trying to link > > against boost built with gcc-6.0.0 will fail to link at the moment, see > > bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331983 . > > It's built in koji for F25 and F24, but it's not been bodhi pushed to > updates-testing for either. I think this is the usual and expected way > things go? There are no known ABI incompatibilities between gcc-6.1.1 (i.e. snapshot a few hours after the GCC 6.1 release) and recent 6.0.0 snapshots (development snapshots months to weeks before the 6.1 release that happened last week). So, are you sure it is really in between gcc-6.0.0-0.20.fc{24,25} and gcc-6.1.1-1.fc{24,25}, and not something you just attribute to newer gcc because you see newer version on it? Jakub -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
