On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 17:19 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > > > I've the critical "required" bits of the 2.0 series working with gcj and > > awaiting OOo qa for integration into the mainline, so the important > > changes are likely to happen before the final 2.0 release unless there > > is a QA problem. The bits that don't currently compile with gcj despite > > those changes are listed at > > http://tools.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=jdk&msgNo=127 > > > > C. > > > ok. thanks for taking the time to respond. I was worried that the java > database wouldnt work at all in gcj. looks like that isnt in the case > for the major parts alteast Not totally up to speed on what the "java database" story is, it *could* be hsqldb. so hsqldb's use of "sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction" is problematic. C.
