On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 2:28:36 PM CDT Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:11:24AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > (only built for F23 for some reason) - please do try it out and give >> > feedback. But we can't do an F24 RC with this issue outstanding, >> > really. We could try an extremely dodgy 'it's not really a blocker' >> > fudge or some kind of heroic attempt for a drive-by packager to apply >> > the changes to the official packages, but I'm not sure either of those >> > is a great idea unless there's some kind of insanely pressing reason to >> > get the Beta out on schedule. I'd rather take the time to consider it >> > properly. >> >> No insanely pressing reason from my point of view. People should be >> aware that if we slip a week, that will leave just 3 weeks between F24 >> release and F25 change submission deadline and the mass rebuild. > > That is incorrect, there is to be no mass rebuild in Fedora 25[1] the > schedule at[2] is wrong Jan will need to fix it, but that will give 3 more > weeks before change submission deadline What is wrong with the schedule ? We have agreed to have mass-rebuild in each schedule and in case the mass-rebuild will not be needed, we will just skip it. Or are you pointing to something else ? Jan > Dennis > > [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/OGRU3B2G7BQ4IW7CYYAMT265L6CSRLIJ/ > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
