On 04/27/2016 04:19 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 27/04/16 03:00, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> As for Option 1)? I think someone with more knowledge of the individual modules >> in Fedora (Tom Hughes? Jared Smith?) would need to figure out how many modules >> would be broken if we downgraded. If it's sufficiently small, I suppose we could >> epoch-bump nodejs and its virtual npm Provides: and go that route. I don't love >> that we will effectively been playing yo-yo with the version in F24, but it >> would be a solution... > > Off the top of my head I'm not aware of anything that requires 5.x and for the > most part I think people try to support at least 4.x and 5.x at the moment, and > often earlier versions as well. > > Tom > OK, I did some repoquery magic just now and came up with (unique-only): nodejs(engine) nodejs(engine) >= 0.1 nodejs(engine) >= 0.10 nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.0 nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.12 nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.15 nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.3 nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.36 nodejs(engine) >= 0.1.103 nodejs(engine) >= 0.12.0 nodejs(engine) >= 0.1.90 nodejs(engine) > 0.1.90 nodejs(engine) >= 0.2.0 nodejs(engine) >= 0.2.0-0 nodejs(engine) >= 0.2.4 nodejs(engine) >= 0.2.5 nodejs(engine) >= 0.3.0 nodejs(engine) >= 0.3.1 nodejs(engine) >= 0.3.6 nodejs(engine) >= 0.4 nodejs(engine) >= 0.4. nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.0 nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.1 nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.2 nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.7 nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.9 nodejs(engine) >= 0.6 nodejs(engine) >= 0.6.0 nodejs(engine) >= 0.6.19 nodejs(engine) >= 0.6.3 nodejs(engine) >= 0.6.6 nodejs(engine) >= 0.8 nodejs(engine) >= 0.8. nodejs(engine) >= 0.8.0 nodejs(engine) >= 0.8.19 nodejs(engine) >= 0.9.0 nodejs(engine) >= 4 nodejs(engine) >= 4.0.0 So according to this, we have nothing in the package collection that is known to require only 5.x or later. So that's a point in favor of the 4.x downgrade approach. I don't love the idea of regressing the versions post-Beta, but it's starting to look like the least-risky approach. We really have no idea what is going to be broken by 6.0 and I don't want to stick some poor volunteer with maintaining backports of a dead upstream release.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
