> More complete bi-arch support on 64-bit at least AMD64? > On FC3, at least /usr/include/kde/arts/gsl/gslconfig.h in > arts-devel (.i386 and .x86_64) conflict, after inspecting both, > one of the #defines differs, so it's not only a packaging problem. > But I have seen other headers that include arch dependent stuff > from /usr/include/asm-i386 or /usr/include/asm-x86_64, respectively. > > Ultimately, I would like to be able to install both <package>-libs > and <package>-devel as the latter may contain static libs in either > /usr/lib or /usr/lib64. Maybe there should be a <package>-headers > that contains the common stuff between the arch dependent -devel RPM. > > Hm. Anaconda or firstboot support to install all the .i386 versions of > the above on x86-64 would be nice. I don't mind downloading all the > 2x N disks for FC4, I installed both versions of FC3 on different > machines, too. Can you please check out the posting from Miloslav and start filing bugzilla requests and maybe also patches to clean up the important base libraries for this? From: Miloslav Trmac <mitr@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Differences in headers between i386 and x86_64 To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 05:04:12 +0200 greetings, Florian La Roche
