On Thursday, April 14, 2016 11:34:08 AM CDT Honza Šilhan wrote: > > From: "Dennis Gilmore" <dennis@xxxxxxxx> > > > > On Thursday, April 7, 2016 7:54:36 AM CDT Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > > > > On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > >>>>>>> "PP" == Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned rich > > > >> PP> strong dependencies in F24 only. This current text extends the > > > >> ban > > > >> PP> to all Fedoras. > > > >> > > > >> PP> Is that intentional? > > > >> > > > >> It's currently correct according to FESCo's request as I understood > > > >> it. > > > >> While f25 might still be able to compose, if the tools aren't fixed > > > >> before the next branch then we'll have to back things out or end up > > > >> back > > > >> in a situation where we can't mash updates. > > > > > > > > I'd say it's fine for now. Our *hope* is that we will be able to > > > > support > > > > them for F25 at some point, but composes *right now* probably don't > > > > work, > > > > so I think this wording is fine. > > > > > > So you don't expect that mash could be fixed/replaced before the F24 > > > release in June, then? > > > > All of the replacements use yum also. The issues may be due to rhel7'a rpm > > not > > supporting boolean deps.It is not a small problem to fix and it needs some > > people to sit down and figure out how to best deal with them. > > We've built whole DNF stack supporting rich dependencies for this purpose. > We are in touch with relengs. Hopefully we'll make this done to F25. > > Honza I am afraid you are not in touch with relengs, I have not had any discussions with you. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
