On 04/07/2016 07:28 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
On 02/04/16 13:58 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I've just submitted
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06
This update does two things:
- Updates python to version 2.7.11
- Splits out the python macros into separate packages
It would be helpful if packagers would try building python packages with
these packages installed.
This might be the cause of a recent failure to build Pacemaker while
other Fedoras (24 + 25) were OK:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13522053
See
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2053/13522053/mock_output.log
Package python-macros is obsoleted by python-rpm-macros, but
obsoleting package does not provide for requirements
Subsequent build succeeded, though:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750257
So it must have been an intermittent issue.
Can this be prevented next time a basic build dependency
is restructured? Or would it require additional support
in the build infra?
I tried to investigate this a little bit.
6 days ago, at around the point the build failed, several overrides
for the build root have been requested:
python-rpm-macros-3-7.fc23:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-rpm-macros-3-7.fc23
redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.1:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.1
python-2.7.11-2.fc23:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-2.7.11-2.fc23
All but the last, expired on 2016-04-01, appear active at the moment.
The last one was superseded with python-2.7.11-3.fc23:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-2.7.11-3.fc23,
which is also active right now.
But clearly, at the moment of the linked build that failed,
python-rpm-macros and redhat-rpm-config were overridden whereas
python-macros-2.7.10-8.fc23+ wasn't. It looks to me I hit a racy
window in which python-2.7.11-2.fc23 override hasn't yet been
applied.
And later, at the moment of the linked build that succeeded,
no such override was active.
I would conclude, please be more careful about management of
overrides to prevent this kind of mess-ups.
Does bodhi allow to specify several builds as a means of an atomic
(non-racy) override? Should I file a RFE for that if not?
You have to submit each package override separately. There also was a
moment when I had to submit an initial version of a couple things, and
then rebuild some dependent packages.
So, there may have been a nearly unavoidable period of breakage, but it
also may be useful to be able to submit a group of packages as overrides
in a single submission.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
