On 04/04/2016 04:28 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> All that said, for F24 I think @standard is probably the right place >> for >> systemd-udev. But I think comps needs to be completely rethought in >> F25+. > > Keep in mind that Fedora Workstation does NOT include @standard as it > brings in some stuff we do not want. systemd-udev will need to be added > to the @workstation-product group as well. OK, so I think Michael is kind of making my point for me: If we have something called @standard whose purpose is essentially to be a small set of things we expect everyone to need... having one of our top-tier deliverables not using it kind of implies that it's not doing its job.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
