Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> koschei is now reporting: >>> >>> Dependency problems nothing provides (sni-qt(x86-64) if >>> plasma-workspace) needed by qt-x11-1:4.8.7-11.fc25.x86_64 >> ... >>> Is this a dnf/koschei issue or with the above conditional requires? >> >> I assume koschei (and friends). >> >>> Are these even allowed yet in Fedora? >> >> I also assumed so, since these rich deps are being used for langpacks >> already > > Unsurprisingly I guess, just received a bug filed today about how yum > doesn't work with the rich dependencies either: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317481 So as a followup , here's my findings: * There are quite a few tools in fedora that still utilize yum code for various things (including mash for composing updates), so knowingly making things incompatible at this point is probably not an option. * yum obviously supports 'Requires:' tag, and recently grew support for 'Recommends:', so one cannot safely use Rich dependencies in combination with either * yum does not support Supplements/Enhances, so using Rich dependencies with these appears safe. It is my understanding that recent langpacks support for f24 is utilizing the Supplements tag -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
