Re: Latest F24 push packages not signed ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2016-03-06 at 10:16 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm getting:
> > 
> > Error: Package systemd-udev-229-5.fc24.x86_64.rpm is not signed
> > 
> > When doing a "dnf update", I'm following the f24 branch / repo.
> > This used to work with previous pushes, and AFAIK F24 pushes
> > are supposed to be signed ?

> They're not gated until bodhi is enabled so there's a window where we
> can't guarantee they're signed so this is expected, come Tuesday when
> bodhi is enabled it will be.

I thought we were going to change this so the repo configuration didn't
enable signature checking till after we turn on Bodhi?
-- Adam WilliamsonFedora QA Community MonkeyIRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . nethttp://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux