On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:58:16PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Of course, but surely we can still do soname bumps when removing > previously-released API, to detect such breakage before it reaches > rawhide users. No, we cannot. If we did, then changes to any new API added to gtk+ during the unstable cycle would require soname bumps. That would defeat the point of having unstable releases. Cheers, Rishi
Attachment:
pgpopsGc8kauN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
