On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert >> these scripts over so that they can run entirely under the built-in LUA >> interpreter of RPM and eliminate this problem. > > I know that the language is spelled “Lua”, not “LUA”. Not sure if > that's enough qualification. > > The fundamental question is whether you want to preserve this script as > a Lua script, for running outside of RPM. If not, we can > constant-propagate the command line flags into the script and simplify > it somewhat. > The ideal case is for it to be usable by the end-user to change the Edition (or, more commonly, assign one if it's non-product at the moment). That said, I'm open to treating that as a nice-to-have and fixing just the install/upgrade cases right now. > Note that the script would have to run under the RPM Lua interpreter, > the plain Lua interpreter does not provide some required functionality > (such as posix.files function). And you cannot run the script from a > file system path, you have to put it directly into the spec file. > So all the content has to be inline, or we can create a common script/function and call it multiple times?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
