On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 12:55 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > blktap-3.0.0-4.fc24.git0.9.2.src.rpm > crda-3.18_2015.10.22-1.fc24.src.rpm > dahdi-tools-2.10.0-6.fc24.src.rpm > gmqcc-0.3.5-8.fc23.src.rpm > gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.7.1-1.fc24.src.rpm > ipv6calc-0.99.1-13.fc24.src.rpm > libpfm-4.6.0-3.fc23.src.rpm At least this one has already been fixed upstream: https://sourceforge.net/p/perfmon2/libpfm4/ci/85081d81b4020679a5d44790e249cfd56259baae/ > libreswan-3.16-1.fc24.src.rpm > lldpad-1.0.1-2.git986eb2e.fc24.src.rpm > loudmouth-1.5.1-1.fc24.src.rpm > memkind-0.3.0-1.fc24.src.rpm > nemo-2.8.6-1.fc24.src.rpm > nfs-ganesha-2.3.0-2.fc24.src.rpm > ocaml-libvirt-0.6.1.4-10.fc24.src.rpm > pesign-0.111-7.fc24.src.rpm > rstp-04012009git-14.fc23.src.rpm > xneur-0.17.0-5.fc23.src.rpm > -Wunused-const-variable > debate whether this is a good idea is still ongoing The discussion is in this bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901 But it could really use some concrete examples instead of handwaving about hypotheticals. There is also a slight tweak to what is/isn't considered "unused" patch under review here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01433.html If people could test that out to see if that makes them happy/sad that would also be appreciated. Cheers, Mark -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
