On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yet another completely avoidable fatal error caused by SELinux. How many
such show stoppers will it take until people finally realize that enabling
SELinux by default was a horrible idea?
Not to put too fine a point on it, but I see SELinux like a seat-belt in a car. Yes, you can point out some cases where someone would have been safer *not* wearing a seat-belt, or would have been less inconvenienced. But the benefits vastly outweigh the inconvenience. So yes, SELinux does cause the occasional problem in development -- but I'd much rather have slightly more complicated development if it means a safer experience for Fedora users.
--
--
Jared Smith
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
