Hi Eric, yes, /bin is a symlink to /usr/bin already. However this doesn't matter if it is just symlink or different folder. When provides of /bin/sed will be removed, dependency tree will be broken due to packages which require /bin/sed. If you ask about that. Change was done because /usr/bin should be used since many releases of Fedora ago. Petr On 10.2.2016 07:19, Eric Griffith wrote: > I don't have a Fedora system in front of me, but on new installs isn't /bin a symlink to /usr/bin already? Functionally, whats the effect of this change? Pardon the confusion. > > On Feb 10, 2016 00:56, "Petr Stodulka" <pstodulk@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pstodulk@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > I apologize if this mail is here twice, I can't find previous mail. > ---------------------------------------- > > Hi folks, > after years /bin/sed move to /usr/bin/sed. I add provides of /bin/sed > so dependency list shouldn't be broken. However correct please your > specfiles too. I want to cancel it in F26. > > Packages which require /bin/sed binary: > -------------------------------- > libnetdude > libpcapnav > mod_fcgid > os-prober > policycoreutils > redhat-lsb > resource-agents > xchat > > > > > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
