On 02/08/2016 01:16 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 02/08/2016 12:45 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: >>> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:21 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: >>>> Part of the change is defining the exact subset. The idea is that it >>>> should be small, to keep cloud images small for apps that don't use >>>> Python themselves. >>> Wouldn't it be a better goal to not have Python at all on Cloud images? >>> >> So... no dnf? That seems a little unlikely to yield a good long-term result. > If Cloud becomes Atomic, it probably wouldn't have dnf. Current atomic > builds don't. I'm not sure how far off the hybrid rpm install rpms in > an rpm-ostree release is going to be. > That might be the goal, that anything in atomic would have to use sysstem-python. Would be a good start. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
