On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 21:27 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > pri.rhl3@xxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Iadonisi) writes: > > > At the risk of stirring up a hornets' nest, I'd like to pose the > > question to Red Hatters: what approach are you taking to trademarks? > > Apparently, there is (was?) some discussion going on at debian-legal > > regarding Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird. At first glance, I > > see that there are quite a few patches included in the firefox rpm in > > FC3 and even more in rawhide and I'm wondering if Red Hat has filtered > > this through its legal eagles, since it is still called Firefox. > > ACK; I really doubt whether rawhide's firefox can be called 'Firefox'. > The applied patches lower quality and reputation of the Mozilla Firefox > product significantly (buttugly icons, removed functionality for upgrading > extensions with security leaks) so I do not see how the Mozilla Foundation > could accept this package as an official build or a "Community Edition"; > it is definitively an "Iceweasel". Chris Aillon is a girl!!!
