On 29. 1. 2016 at 22:03:00, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > FWIW I found the new database backend (not mentioned anywhere in the > original submission). It is here: > > http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git;a=tree;f=lib/backend/ndb > > Since this change has (rashly) been approved by FESCO, I guess we're > going to be copying this code into some libguestfs tools, and we'll > have to keep up with changes to RPM. It's a drag compared to using a > real key-value store. May I ask why? Accessing rpm database in a different way than through librpm API is highly discouraged even now. Thanks Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
