On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 19:28 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 01/27/2016 06:26 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 09:11 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote: > > > Will exist a browser which can run this plugin? Firefox is going > > > to > > > remove NPAPI plugin support (it's disabled by default now), > > > Chrome > > > already did so. Does Web (Epiphany) run NPAPI? > > > > Yes, we intend to continue supporting NPAPI plugins. However, NPAPI > > plugins are not currently supported under Wayland. We intend to add > > support for windowless plugins, such as the GNOME Shell browser > > plugin; > > the support is already written (it's awaiting code review), so it > > should be ready prior to F24. > > > > Windowed plugins (Flash, Java, etc.) will not be supported under > > Wayland. We will continue to support them under X11 indefinitely. > > As for building NPAPI plugins, there's a separate project that only > ships the required headers. I've forgotten what it's called, but > Debian > uses it to build their NPAPI plugins and it probably needs just > packaging up if the plan is to drop xulrunner. The pkgconfig file > name > is different from xulrunner's, but since Debian already uses it I > expect > most project are already checking both pkgconfig names. npapi-sdk A patch for PackageKit was submitted upstream years ago by openSUSE: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40026 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
