On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > LLVM upstream is (eventually) dropping their autotools build system in > favor of their cmake buildsystem. This wouldn't normally be something > you'd notice, but the two produce different sets of shared libraries, > autotools gave you one big libLLVM and cmake gives you lots of > individual libraries. > > This means the llvm consumers need to be relinked against the new set > of libs, and that's grinding its way through koji now. Hopefully those > will all complete before the next rawhide compose, but arm might hold > us back a bit. > > On the plus side, this makes it possible to actually build lldb, clang, > and compiler-rt independently of the llvm core. This is a huge win from > my perspective because I absolutely do not care about clang and want > never again to get any bugs about it. If you're someone who does care > about one of those subprojects, they could use maintainers. > > - ajax Aren't clang, lldb, and compiler-rt still part of the main LLVM package sources, though? It would make sense to continue building them as part of the LLVM package since they ship together. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
