Ben Cotton wrote: > When speaking to technical people, there is no "close enough" except > for "entirely and unassailably accurate". :-) Hermes Conrad, you are technically correct, the best kind of correct. -- Randy Barlow xmpp: bowlofeggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx irc: bowlofeggs on Freenode
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx