> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 02:37:13PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> I guess this is only partially true.
> Of these 459, 134 contain the string "rm -rf %{pypi_name}.egg-info"
> which make me thinking that those packages are created with the pyp2rpm
> tool, which adds this rm string _by default_ to all packages that have a
> bundled egg-info (see:
> https://github.com/fedora-python/pyp2rpm/blob/master/pyp2rpm/templates/fe...).
>
> As for the other packages, my guess is that the majority were built when
> this was still the policy and have not been modified when the policy
> changed.
>
> Have a nice day,
> Fale
However the issue is still a bit unclear. While a lot of people use pyp2rpm which results to many auto-generated
spec files, would it still be a good approach to include it, so the egg-info can be regenerated through the %build phase?
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
