On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:48:24AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > It shouldn;t be missing that much is true but it also shouldnt oops and > 2.6.10 appears to be behaving properly Don Hardaway reproduced the oops on 2.6.10-1.736_FC3 (and attached it to bug 129966). So, it doesn't appear to be fixed yet. (Of course that doesn't yet answer the question of whether it's an upstream bug or a Fedora bug.) -Barry K. Nathan <barryn@xxxxxxxxx>
