On Sat, 2016-01-16 at 12:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:34:12 +0000 > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Here are a small collection of subject lines of emails sent > > automatically to me by various Fedora systems in the past few days: > > > > Subject: upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2015-850e89be8b > > Subject: [Fedora Update] [comment] auto-buildrequires-1.2-1.fc23 > > Subject: rjones's libguestfs-1.33.1-2.fc24 completed > > Subject: rpmlint PASSED for libguestfs-1.33.1-2.fc24 > > Subject: Broken dependencies: libguestfs > > Subject: ABRT report for package gnome-boxes has reached 10 > > occurrences Subject: [Bug 1269975] svirt very occasionally prevents > > parallel libvirt [..] Subject: Fedora 'packager' sponsor needed for > > suanand Subject: sailer's mingw-sqlite-3.10.1.0-1.fc24 failed to build > > Subject: libguestfs's builds are back to normal in f24 > > Subject: dchen pushed to ocaml-lwt (el6). "New upstream version > > 2.2.0." > > > > The only consistent thing is there's nothing consistent about them :-/ > > > > I'd like to propose a very lightweight "standard" for subject lines of > > emails. > ...snip... > > I think this is a great idea! > > I'll bring up the subject on the infrastructure list and see what folks > there think of it. I'm happy to take requests for the check-compose emails, if a common scheme is decided. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
