On 01/08/2016 11:27 AM, bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294904 > > Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ > > > > --- Comment #12 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Package approved. > I still have heard nothing from the main python maintainers, and I'd like to get some kind of an ack for the following plan: - Dropping the python3-pkgversion-macros package, replaced with python-srpm-macros from above and required by redhat-rpm-config (in Fedora) and epel-rpm-macros (in EPEL). - Dropping the python-macros sub-package from python, replace by Requires: python-rpm-macros from above package. python3 requires this as well. - Dropping macros.python2 from python-devel, replaced with Requires: python2-rpm-macros from above package. - Dropping macros.python3 from python3-devel, replaced with Requires: python3-rpm-macros from above package. This achieves the goal of decoupling modifying/updating the python macros from updating the main python package, which has become a serious hindrance to developing new python rpm macros. The reviewed package contains the Fedora macros. macros will be changed on the EPEL branches. I've requested a side tag to do the build in here - https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6331 as I think the timing is tricky and the possibility of breaking the buildroot moderate. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
