On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:17:37 +0100, Christian Dersch wrote: > > The same procedure has been started a few times, at least > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/736874 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/963890 > > > > Requesting co-maintainer access would be a way to solve such > > isues. > > > I requested it in pkgdb some weeks ago. Got no response, thats why I > started the unresponsive maintainer procedure. Isn't that tedious, inefficient and a waste of time? Having to start the non-responsive maintainer procedure again and again just to get a response (hopefully)? How long have the packages been unmaintained this time? Why protect the package from getting a few co-maintainers? Would help not be welcome in this case? Would FESCo insist on waiting for the procedure to be completed instead of granting an exception? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers#Exception_procedure Now I dunno whether you would be happy with a belated response from the maintainer, but something obviously doesn't work well here. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
