On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 15:01 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > To satisfy my curiosity, I grepped the convenient tarball of > specfiles > (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz) for line > s > matching "(?<!%)%define" (%define but not %%define). To my surprise, > there were more than 1900 hits. > > Here's a complete (long) list. I don't think there's much point in > doing anything about the vast majority of these, but if you're in > cleaning up your packages then why not? Also, feel free to let me > know > if any of these are false positives. (They may be due to %define in > the > changelog or in a "comment", which is also something that should be > fixed.) And if you're using %define because you actually need one of > the peculiar behaviors it exhibits, please let me know because I'd > like > to see an actual example of that. > <snippity> > cf-bonveno-fonts (ankursinha) Fixed. <snip> > gtg (ankursinha) Fixed. <snip> > oflb-notcouriersans-fonts (ankursinha) Fixed. > <snip> > oldstandard-sfd-fonts (ankursinha) Fixed. <snip> > subtitleeditor (mso, ankursinha) Fixed. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
