Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 4 January 2016 at 14:35, Jan Synacek <jsynacek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ... >> Any comments? Maybe there are still people that were involved with the >> change? > > Those unaware of history are doomed to repeat it :) That's why I'm asking ;) > It previously was the case that packages that also shipped support > files for emacs were required to ship the emacs bits in a sub-package. > However, the result was that very few packagers actually complied, and > indeed some just shipped the emacs bits as %docs. > > The move to using emacs-filesystem (proposed by me) was a move to be > consistent with vim and xemacs practices. The packages you are talking > about are primarily not emacs add-ons, but packages that also ship a > couple of elisp files to provide auxillary emacs support if emacs is > present on the system. Pulling in the whole emacs stack in such cases > would be overkill. However, having the user have to install endless > emacs-foo packages just to install a few elisp files also seemed like > overkill. The emacs-filesystem approach was a happy compromise, and > already a widely used strategy in Fedora (see vim, xemacs etc). I > still think it's the best approach, personally, as splitting out all > these little elisp files into their own packages just increases > package metadata bloat. This is the explanation I was looking for, thank you! > Any change to the current situation would need to be agreed with the > FPC, and coordinated distro wide. Given that we're only now > approaching compliance with the current emacs add-on packaging > guidelines, I can imagine some resistance to the change you're > proposing. > > I don't see why there are "WTF moments" when emacs-filesystem i > installed - it contains a few directories, and nothing else. > > For info: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs Cheers, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
