Dne 24.12.2015 v 22:01 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a): > To satisfy my curiosity, I grepped the convenient tarball of specfiles > (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz) for lines > matching "(?<!%)%define" (%define but not %%define). To my surprise, > there were more than 1900 hits. > > Here's a complete (long) list. I don't think there's much point in > doing anything about the vast majority of these, but if you're in > cleaning up your packages then why not? Also, feel free to let me know > if any of these are false positives. (They may be due to %define in the > changelog or in a "comment", which is also something that should be > fixed.) And if you're using %define because you actually need one of > the peculiar behaviors it exhibits, please let me know because I'd like > to see an actual example of that. > > (Own goal notice: I have a few packages on this list. Off to fix them > up now.) > > > ruby-activerecord (stahnma) > ruby-activesupport (stahnma) Are these some zombies or what is it? Vít -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
