Re: no systemd in containers: Requires -> Recommends

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

>>>>>> "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> RWMJ> Couldn't it use inotify (or whatever we're using these days to
> RWMJ> detect filesystem changes)?  So when you drop in the unit file,
> RWMJ> systemd notices and reloads.
> 
> Well, the point is that systemd isn't running or even installed when the
> daemons are installed.  The question is what happens when systemd comes
> up later.  (And yes, systemd could use rpm file triggers so that we can
> drop the scriptlets entirely.  That would be great, but it's an entirely
> separate discussion.)
> 
> I know this thread has gone in a completely different direction, but the
> original message was about modifying or removing the dependencies.  Can
> we drop dependencies on systemd and still have a system that works as
> expected if systemd gets installed later?

One way to help make that work would be to adjust existing systemd 
scriptlets to use triggers (on systemd)

(that's probably not practical though)

-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux