On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii-fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > rpm could track more than hashes of config files, and instead track the full > file. This could be optional, as it uses more disk space, but disk space is > cheap these days, and config files are relatively small. This would avoid > having to re-download the rpm, and would make it easier to see what has been > modified on their system. So, some users may find that a worthwhile > trade-off. > I rather like this idea. My laptop has 35MB of /etc contents. My laptop has 240M of conffiles. I suspect it has rather less that that in stock conffiles (the majority is the RPM DB itself, and most of that is presumably shipped empty). Doing this might add a considerable incentive for packages to fix the fact that they have large conffiles. For example: 106M /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive excuse me? 80K /usr/share/ghostscript/9.16/Resource/Init/gs_init.ps not that big, but that has to be a bug. Buggy things aside, we really should move to a model in which pretty much everything lives in /usr/share and /etc is just overrides. For example: 56K /etc/mime.types 58K /etc/mail/sendmail.cf 60K /etc/mono/2.0/DefaultWsdlHelpGenerator.aspx 60K /etc/mono/4.0/DefaultWsdlHelpGenerator.aspx 60K /etc/mono/4.5/DefaultWsdlHelpGenerator.aspx 64K /etc/pki/nssdb/cert8.db 70K /etc/jwhois.conf 81K /etc/lvm/lvm.conf For the few cases that can't or won't comply, then having rpm (optionally?) make the originals available would be fantastic for system management. --Andy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
