Am 09.12.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski:
On Wednesday, 09 December 2015 at 10:37, Tom Hughes wrote:On 09/12/15 09:34, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:If your username is krege you got at least three e-mail on 2015-11-26, -15 and -10 to krege fedoraproject org, therefore I suggest that you check your Spam folder/e-mail configuration.And I found those letters. Sorry, it was... very nontrivial. Heades (@ sign was manually edited): From: opensource-at-till.name To: devel-at-lists.fedoraproject.org // ! (my note) ... Delivered-To: krege-at-fedoraproject.org // and here we are Sure it was auto-moved into devel@ folder. Is it OK to use such a "To" field?Well it's a report to the list, bcced to you as an affected person presumably. If you want to filter list mails then List-Id is a much better thing to filter on than the To header. That way a direct copy to you won't trigger the filter.I was bitten by this two times already. Once, when fedora migrated all mailing list names from fedora-foo to just foo and recently, when the lists were migrated to hyperkitty. Here's my current procmailrc recipe for unmangling the e-mails to fedora mailing lists and sorting them to fedora-foo maildirs:
hence use the envelope-sender Return-Path: devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
:0
* ^List-Id:.*<\/[^\.]+\.lists\.fedoraproject\.org
{
LISTNAME = fedora-`echo $MATCH | sed -e 's/[\/]/_/g' -e 's/.lists.fedoraproject.org//'`
:0:
$MAILDIR/.$LISTNAME/
}
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
